Hooray for Captain Spaulding |
Posting to you live
|
Wednesday, March 31, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
10:52 AM
# | | Wednesday, March 17, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:21 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:10 PM
# | | Monday, March 15, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
2:37 PM
What interests me is this page and whose blacked-out name is on the list with Lou Costello and George Raft. Possibly the guy in front of "et. al" in the previous sentence. UPDATE: Apparently Raft appeared on an episode of The Colgate Comedy Hour when it was hosted by Abbott and Costello. I refuse to speculate the subject of any discussions they might have had. # | | Sunday, March 14, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
10:09 AM
Saturday, March 13th: The punchline of Boondocks is the hackneyed "I love gay people; more broads for me!" I guess timing is the most important part of comedy (or, to steal from Buddy Hackett, "Ask me what's the most important part of comedy." "What's the most import..." "Timing!") The EW list does inspire a new SNL game: Any time Maya Rudolph is in a crappy sketch, say "That's not just funny; that's 20th Funniest Person in America funny!" # | | Thursday, March 11, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
10:34 AM
When you first wrote that, I thought: there's no way they'll drop it. But yeah, if it's cheap to produce, it's cheap to cut and run.This is semi-unprecedented. There have been lawsuits that the producers of Survivor convinced contestants to keep the more telegenic contestants. One could argue that the post-Joe Millionaire interviews where Joe says the producers made him choose the winner were responsible for the sequel's low ratings. But I can't think of an instance where a talent show format had claims of fraud. Although supposedly Brian Dunkleman was going to write a tell-all, explosive, behind-the-scenes book about American Idol. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
10:27 AM
And they suggested that the networks limit the replacement of scripted series with reality shows, which have less predictable and more potentially objectionable content. # | | Wednesday, March 10, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
6:32 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
6:31 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
6:07 PM
Lileks cites this site as the first time that the rabbit got to eat Trix. Actually I recollect elections where kids got to vote whether to allow the rabbit to eat Trix. The results for the first one in 1980 never had its results announced. My suspicion is that the rabbit won and that was too radical a departure for General Mills. He officially won the 1984 election but the fine print was that he only got one bowl of Trix which he preceded to gobble up. The kids refused to give him more for the standard reason. Ruth Shalit wrote two fascinating articles in 2000 (this one and this one) about the lengths companies go to protect their corporate mascots and keep them in character. Speaking of cereal mascots, I once followed a comic who had a bit about how the cereal mascots could be divided into three categories: those that wanted the cereal but can't get it, those that have the cereal and want to prevent others from getting it, and those trying to convince others to eat the cereal. He stated there were no neutral mascots. I countered with the Quaker Oats man. # | | Tuesday, March 09, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
8:16 AM
# | | Monday, March 08, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:55 PM
I'm curious whether the "Monk is going to New York! Yaaaaayyy!" development is intended as a season-wide development or just for an episode or two. It wouldn't be such a terrible thing for an entire season (about 13 weeks): You have an anal-retentive character living in the dirtiest city in the world (at least, pre-Giuliani any way) and you have a city police force who doesn't know Monk and would be less tolerant of his quirks or his kibbitzing. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:45 PM
This hoax (since it got caught before it could be published) is not quite as good as when Snopes sent Ann Landers a letter claiming that the Pharmacist's Daughter legend happened to him. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:38 PM
Last year's show had a disclaimer that celebrity judges' decisions would not be the determining factor. Either the celebrity judges were better briefed on the matter or the disparity in talent between those chosen due to non-stand-up criteria and those not chosen is larger this year. The latter is actually believable; what's surprised me in looking into this is the number of B+ to A- list folk who tried out for this thing this year (Perhaps under the theory of "Given how much this show helped last year's contestants, imagine what would happen if a contestant had talent."). Viewers of last year's show may remember Ant, the comic Carey mentions as someone who undeservedly made the top ten, as the guy Joe Rogan busted for having jokes that were at best hackneyed and were more likely stolen. The most hilarious part of Ant last year was his claim to only have been doing stand-up for a couple of years, a claim belied by his imdb listing. A friend of mine, noting the Olympics-style tales of hardship and woe on the show, pointed out that these tales contradicted the comics' tendency to shave a few years off of how long they had been performing. "Either it's been a long, hard struggle or you've been comedy for two years; not both." # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:04 PM
# | |
|