Hooray for Captain Spaulding |
Posting to you live
|
Saturday, October 23, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
7:48 AM
# | | Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
11:05 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:36 PM
I don't know what idea they eventually developed although I suspect it involved inviting each to the White House without saying the other was there, having each get something from the cellar, and "accidentally" locking them in the cellar together. Or you have them stuck in an elevator together and a pregnant woman who only speaks Spanish goes into labor. UPDATE: While looking up the first-season episode that my brother alluded to in comments, I found a description of last night's episode. The part where it says "Kate [...]provides Jed with the hook he needs to get the Israelis and Palestinians to sit down together at Camp David" makes me suspect that said hook is so crazy that it just might work. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
3:30 PM
I should clarify part of the point of my "Humorless Left Review Team America" series which was to highlight reviews where the reviewer liked it up to the point where his ox was gored. So, for example, this Roger Ebert review doesn't count anymore than my grandma's elderly friend complaining about the filthy language does. And the review my friend Chip Pope posts in the comments here doesn't count since he dislikes the whole movie rather than the select parts and I respect his opinion (even if he did like In & Out (but then I liked Wrongfully Accused so who am I to talk?)). Meanwhile Edelstein clarifies his review and makes fun of his right-wing critics here. He states that his critics probably didn't enjoy "The Passion of the Jew" episode to which I reply:
*I didn't use to buy into the idea that neoconservative was a code word for Jew until a) a non-Jewish, liberal, Nader-voter friend of mine asked me if neoconservative was code for Jew and b) I kept seeing Jonah Goldberg's name in neo-conservative lists and the only thing "neo" about his conservatism is his Jewish surname. # | | Monday, October 18, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
4:58 PM
# | | Friday, October 15, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
6:37 PM
# | | Thursday, October 14, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
8:15 PM
The reason that part is ridiculous is because "[l]eftist actors learned from Vietnam not to cozy up to dictators" to which one can only reply, "See Penn, Sean". Spoiler Alert:Edelstein has a revealing Freudian slip when he refers to the part of the movie when "Team America destroys the Panama Canal" since it was terrorists who blew up the Panama Canal. And while the terrorists publicly claim anger over Team America's actions in Cairo as their motive, it is made fairly clear in the movie that even if Team America had done nothing that the terrorists would have blown up the Canal anyway. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
8:01 PM
And then my reading glasses broke. Oh, the cruel, cruel irony. # | | Tuesday, October 12, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
11:45 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
11:38 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
11:05 PM
Contrary to earlier speculation, I did see the R-rated version. I judge this by the fact that the credits included a parody of Aerosmith's song during a sex scene in Armageddon which did not appear in the movie. And also the presence of kids in the theater. I don't mean a fifteen-year-old with his parents; I mean a family with little kids where either the parents couldn't get a sitter or just thought "Oh, how cute, puppets." A smarter guy than I could write an essay on the fact that this movie is as close as we're going to get to a testosterone-laden movie where terrorist ass is kicked and what that says about Hollywood. Granted the lack could just be a matter of the importance of the foreign markets (and, until Pearl Harbor, many studios didn't want to make anti-Nazi movies for similar reasons). Still, three years after 9/11, this is as close as we've gotten to this war's Casablanca or even this war's You Nazty Spy. # | | Saturday, October 09, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:02 AM
(Anecdotal Evidence that Newspaper Registration Schemes Are Dumb Dept.: I was going to link to LA Times story on this but they make their "CalendarLive" content subscriber-only. So I found a better link.) # | | Thursday, October 07, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:15 PM
HANS BLIX: You need to let me inspect your palace. Or else.Many folk were saying whatever administration figure told Drudge that he was angry at the film was an idiot. Or at least not familiar with the concept of the South Park Republican. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
8:58 PM
*(login: cptspaulding/cptspaulding) # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
4:14 PM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
4:11 PM
As a kid, I had no luck with girls. One girl told me "Come over to my place. No one's home." So I went to her place. No one was home.The joke was so funny that the audience actually laughed at it rather than politely applauded to the APPLAUSE sign. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
10:33 AM
Later today (Wed.), the Boston Globe, the A.P. and Dan Rather all present new and damning information about how George W. Bush got moved to the front of the line to get in the Texas Air National Guard, and how he then went AWOL. I am putting every ounce of trust I have in my fellow Americans that a majority of them get this, get the injustice of it all, and get the sad, sick twisted irony of how it relates very, very much to our precious Election 2004.(via Tim Blair) UPDATE: When I said before that this was likely a publicity push because his DVD came out Tuesday, I was mistaken. It's a publicty push for five things that came out on Tuesday. More from Moorelies.com # | | Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Posted by Daniel Frank at
9:24 AM
# | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
7:46 AM
By the way, I'm positive that Michael Moore really did get the memos and isn't just saying he did to get publicity for the DVD release of his movie. # | |
Posted by Daniel Frank at
7:37 AM
One Kerry Spot reader came up with an interesting jujitsu counter-move: Nothing. Let the DNC win the online polls and the e-mail wars. What will happen when MSNBC or CNN go to discuss the instant results of their online poll... and learn that 99 percent of viewers thought Edwards won?He then suggested as "a truly nefarious" act of sabotage that readers start sending email to editors in the afternoon. One reader followed his advice and received a profanity-laden reply from an Ohio newspaper quoted in full in the article. # | |
|